I LOVE taking the complex, the chaotic and that which inspires confusion and distilling it into simplicity, making it really easy for us to understand.  There are two functions in that, I believe, make information and concepts simple: 1) the information itself.  2) the presentation of the information.  We could take a really simple explanation  and complicate it further by the presentation  method or approach.  And what is right for one audience is not for another.  But there are tenents which cross bultipple boundaries.

This TED talk gives a hint into creating simplicity from complexity on the informational side.

Although full of fun, this video brings up another elephant I haven’t seen anyone call out yet: The impossibility of the game of Cow Tipping.

“New ideas that are simpler to understand are adopted more rapidly than innovations that require the adopter to develop new skills and understanding, such as the Dvorak keyboard.” (Diffusion of Innovations, p. 15)

Complexity comes in a few different flavors that I have identified – and I am sure there are more: physically, mentally and theoretically.

PHYSICALLY

Let’s talk virtually physical.  Let’s say that a new process is put in place (which will happen somewhere / sometime when social learning is introduced).  If I can’t navigate my way through it simply, I will resist it.  Just like the process change in this story, it needs to be simple.

To use Twitter we needed to go to the website.  Any updates?  The web site.  Check other’s tweets?  The web site.  It wasn’t until third party apps came out – like Twhirl & Tweetdeck and plugins like Twitterfox – that Twitter took off.  Why?  They took the complexity away from getting and giving updates.  Now it is simple to crank out and flood ourselves with 140 characters.

MENTALLY

Imagine being accustomed to a simple, easy to understand text editor.  Now switch that to one that uses HTML and shows HTML as you use it.  How much use will it get?  Not much.  This is exactly why the ‘Pages’ feature of a NING network are not used very often (did you even know they had one?).  It is too complex to learn and so users simply don’t (even though personally I think a true wiki would be a GREAT addition and would love to see it added).

THEORETICALLY

I set up a NING network for a home school group our family is involved in.  The feedback overwhelmingly positive for so many reasons.  But, as you can guess, there are a couple people who don’t like it.  One teacher in particular doesn’t like it because she is not sure that parents are reading her reports on the blog.  She knows that with email it is right in front of them and so, in her estimation, it is read.  But with a blog post no one NEEDS to look at it and so she fears they might not.

It is difficult for her to make the theoretical jump.  I won’t go into the reasons why it is a good move (I think we all know those), but in her mind it is too complex to make the shift.  It does not make sense to her.  You will find many people who have a hard time getting over this hump.  Heck, I was just talking with a customer service manager today who had a phone conversation with a guy who won’t use email.  To him, it is a waste of time and too complex.

If we want to overcome the complixity issue, make things as simple as possible.  Web sites should naturally take you where you want (they want you) to go.  It should not be hard to get there – wherever ‘there’ is.  Finding information should be a snap.  If they can’t find what they need, it will be too complex and won’t be adopted.

Lesson learned: MAKE IT EASY for them to do what they need to do.

What follows is a short series of at least 5 posts.  Each will focus on one aspect of what it takes to adopt social learning / media within an organization as well as with customers and prospects.

The information is taken from the book Diffusion of Innovations by Everett M. Rogers and then applied to social learning.  This is one of THE books, in my estimation, which will help the most when trying to help others adopt anything – technology, a new culture, processes, even hybrid corn in Iowa.  A fabulous read.  If you don’t have it, get it.

The five principles of adoption are:

1. 1) Relative Advantage
2. 2) Compatibility
3. 3) Complexity
4. 4) Trialability
5. 5) Observability

These posts talk about AFTER the sale and implementation.  (Although these things should be taken into consideration BEFORE all of that.) These posts answer the question,

“Now that we have it there, how do we get them to use it?”

Because – trust me – just because it is there DOES NOT mean that it will be used.

Again, this question should be part of a strategy long before implementation and should be constantly re-examined during and after.